Read this article and discuss the efficacy of POS in contributing to important organizational outcomes based upon the observations of this analysis. Be certain to include and cite data from this article to support your position.
Cameron, K., Mora, C., Leutscher, T., & Calarco, M. (2011). Effects of positive practices on organizational effectiveness. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47(3), 266-308. doi:10.1177/0021886310395514
Define and describe positive deviance in an organizational setting. Discuss the importance of self determination and efficacy to positive deviance. Think of an experience you have had in a work setting (or imagine if you do not have extensive work experience) in which you could have influenced the situation better through positive deviance.
Include at least 3 scholarly sources other than the textbook. I point you to one:
The flow state is defined as a person becoming fully absorbed in the the present. In positive psychology it is associated with increased mindfulness, happiness, and subjective well-being. In organizations it may have important influence on personal productively, job satisfaction, and organizational performance measures. Review scholarly sources on this state and discuss the possible connection of flow with the following topics:
1) How flow is defined and measured
2) Meaningfulness in work/finding a "calling"
3) Job satisfaction/Life satisfaction
4) Productivity (You may wish to explore a connection with the Job Characteristics model from Hackman and Oldham)
5) Can it be consistently achieved and if so how?
This assignment should be 1000 to 1200 words in length.
APA and include at least 5 scholarly sources
To aid in that pursuit:
Salanova, M., Bakker, A., & Llorens, S. (2006). Flow at work: Evidence for an upward spiral of personal and organizational resources. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(1), 1-22. doi:10.1007/s10902-005-8854-8
Jackson, S., Martin, A., & Eklund, R. (2008). Long and short measures of flow: The construct validity of the fss-2, dfs-2, and new brief counterparts. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30(5), 561-561.